DC Organic and Cheap Shopper: December 2011

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Plants Looking For New Homes

Organic and cheap -
Plants that I would like to pass along - for cheap! As in: Free! I have brought them all indoors but would like to free up some space. There are a total of five plants - two avocados (one tall, one bushier), one rubber plant and two big broad leaf tropicals - bird's nest ferns? The pictures were taken on December 8, 2011 - a warm day here in DC. I took the plants outside to spray them with a neem oil solution and a vegetable oil solution. They have also been treated for ants with boric acid. All inside now.

They are all tough plants - able to stand all sorts of stress although the avocados are thirsty. The rubber plant can withstand the strangest water regimen including drought, the big leaf things likewise. They are like camels; never know where the next drink will come from. The avocados do require water often. Otherwise very forgiving.

The following are two different plants - one in a red container the other in a black container. They are big.

I think the discoloration is from near frost - perhaps pest control oil - watching it now that it is inside.

Following are two avocados and a rubber plant:

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

On the search for organic and cheap in Washington, DC - a city known as high budget. How low can a family of four reduce the food budget? Is organic food possible on a budget? What ways can the rest of the monthly budget be reduced while striving for healthy, fresh and organic products? Let's also throw in low carbon footprint, fair trade and cruelty free goals. And/or maybe it is the other way around - I am the DC organic and cheap shopper! I am organic, cheap and I have lived in Washington, DC, for 20+ years. I do travel and even on the road I am the DC organic and cheap shopper. So big picture and minute details can be found here. Thanks for reading!

FTC Sets Endorsement Rules for Blogs

By Cecilia Kang
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Bloggers who offer endorsements must disclose any payments they have received from the subjects of their reviews or face penalties of up to $11,000 per violation, the Federal Trade Commission said Monday.

The agency, charged with protecting consumer interests, had not updated its policy on endorsements in nearly three decades, well before the Internet became a force in shaping consumer tastes. The new rules attempt to make more transparent corporate payments to bloggers, research firms and celebrities that help promote a product.

"Given that social media has become such a significant player in the advertising area, we thought it was necessary to address social media as well," said Richard Cleland, assistant director for the division of advertising practices at the FTC.

Consumer interest groups have long complained about the lack of disclosure. They say consumers often have no way of telling what corporate payments have been made to bloggers writing on parenting, fitness, dieting and financial services sites, for example.

Consumers Union, a nonprofit advocacy group that publishes Consumer Reports, launched WebWatch.com to monitor bloggers' ties to corporate sponsors. But the group shut down the site earlier this year after it ran out of funding.

"The revised guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement," the FTC said in a release. "Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service."

Rick Calvert, chief executive of the blogger conference BlogWorld & New Media Expo, said his organization believes bloggers should disclose compensation they receive from companies they write about, including when they receive free products.

But he said it would be difficult to enforce the FTC's policy with "tens of millions of blogs, podcasts and other forms of new media content out there and growing every day." And he said bloggers are divided about the rules, with some finding it perfectly acceptable to accept products without disclosure.

The new guidelines also affect how advertisers use studies by research institutes they help fund. Any financial ties must now be disclosed when companies cite the findings of a research organization they fund.

"We have for years tried to get the FTC to adopt fair disclosure of ties that provided financial support for studies that were submitted" to agencies like the Federal Communications Commission, said Joel Kelsey, a policy analyst at Consumers Union. "It's fine to submit those comments, we just absolutely believe they have to disclose if there are financial ties that led to the writing of those reports."

Punishments for violations will range from a warning letter to a fine of up to $11,000 per violation.

Copyright Disclaimer - Fair Use

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.