Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Less Plastic

Moving forward -

Monday, June 7, 2010, 10:43am EDT | Modified: Monday, June 7, 2010, 2:44pm

MOM's Organic Market dumps bottled water

Washington Business Journal - by Jeff Clabaugh

Rockville-based MOM's Organic Market will no longer sell bottled water as part of a campaign to reduce the use of plastic.

The organic grocer, with six locations in the D.C. and Baltimore area, will instead install water filtration machines at its stores so customers can rely on reusable containers for water. It is also giving customers their first gallon of water free every visit, it said.

"Not only does plastic damage our environment, but it increases our dependence on oil," founder and CEO Scott Nash said in a statement. "The tragic part of our addition is that, by and large, petroleum-based plastics are not necessary for consumer products and packaging as we have the technology and innovation to use plastic products that biodegrade."

MOM's is also eliminating bagged potatoes, onions, oranges and bagged salad mixes, while replacing other plastic products with biodegradable packaging.

MOM's already recycles plastic containers and, in 2005, was among the first grocers to eliminate plastic bags.

jclabaugh@bizjournals.com

http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2010/06/07/daily3.html

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

On the search for organic and cheap in Washington, DC - a city known as high budget. How low can a family of four reduce the food budget? Is organic food possible on a budget? What ways can the rest of the monthly budget be reduced while striving for healthy, fresh and organic products? Let's also throw in low carbon footprint, fair trade and cruelty free goals. And/or maybe it is the other way around - I am the DC organic and cheap shopper! I am organic, cheap and I have lived in Washington, DC, for 20+ years. I do travel and even on the road I am the DC organic and cheap shopper. So big picture and minute details can be found here. Thanks for reading!

FTC Sets Endorsement Rules for Blogs

By Cecilia Kang
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Bloggers who offer endorsements must disclose any payments they have received from the subjects of their reviews or face penalties of up to $11,000 per violation, the Federal Trade Commission said Monday.

The agency, charged with protecting consumer interests, had not updated its policy on endorsements in nearly three decades, well before the Internet became a force in shaping consumer tastes. The new rules attempt to make more transparent corporate payments to bloggers, research firms and celebrities that help promote a product.

"Given that social media has become such a significant player in the advertising area, we thought it was necessary to address social media as well," said Richard Cleland, assistant director for the division of advertising practices at the FTC.

Consumer interest groups have long complained about the lack of disclosure. They say consumers often have no way of telling what corporate payments have been made to bloggers writing on parenting, fitness, dieting and financial services sites, for example.

Consumers Union, a nonprofit advocacy group that publishes Consumer Reports, launched WebWatch.com to monitor bloggers' ties to corporate sponsors. But the group shut down the site earlier this year after it ran out of funding.

"The revised guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement," the FTC said in a release. "Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service."

Rick Calvert, chief executive of the blogger conference BlogWorld & New Media Expo, said his organization believes bloggers should disclose compensation they receive from companies they write about, including when they receive free products.

But he said it would be difficult to enforce the FTC's policy with "tens of millions of blogs, podcasts and other forms of new media content out there and growing every day." And he said bloggers are divided about the rules, with some finding it perfectly acceptable to accept products without disclosure.

The new guidelines also affect how advertisers use studies by research institutes they help fund. Any financial ties must now be disclosed when companies cite the findings of a research organization they fund.

"We have for years tried to get the FTC to adopt fair disclosure of ties that provided financial support for studies that were submitted" to agencies like the Federal Communications Commission, said Joel Kelsey, a policy analyst at Consumers Union. "It's fine to submit those comments, we just absolutely believe they have to disclose if there are financial ties that led to the writing of those reports."

Punishments for violations will range from a warning letter to a fine of up to $11,000 per violation.

Copyright Disclaimer - Fair Use

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.