DC Organic and Cheap Shopper: Fair Trade Cacoa Marketing

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Fair Trade Cacoa Marketing - Rasta In Italy

From Italy, summer 2009, I bought this Cacao - Fair Trade, organic...... While the man on the box is not clearly Rasta, the implication is Rasta - the tam, red, gold and green (with shades).... I made hot chocolate with it - good stuff.

Packaged as Cacao, Amaro in Polvere, it is farmed according to principles of biological agriculture in the Dominican Republic and Bolivia (neither with large Rasta representation). It is sold by the Green Spirit label.

3 comments:

UnknownJuly 28, 2010 at 9:30 PM
Yeah I purchased the Esselunga BIO brand "Cacao Amaro - In polvere". Absolutely the best chocolate coco powder I have ever tasted! I wish I could order some more but I can't find anyone that sells it?
ReplyDelete
Replies
TegoJuly 29, 2010 at 2:27 PM
I bought it at an organic type grocery in Torino. The web site on the box www.baulevolante.it has limited info. It is good stuff!
ReplyDelete
Replies
TegoJuly 29, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Click on the scan to enlarge and you can see all the address info of the manufacturer.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

On the search for organic and cheap in Washington, DC - a city known as high budget. How low can a family of four reduce the food budget? Is organic food possible on a budget? What ways can the rest of the monthly budget be reduced while striving for healthy, fresh and organic products? Let's also throw in low carbon footprint, fair trade and cruelty free goals. And/or maybe it is the other way around - I am the DC organic and cheap shopper! I am organic, cheap and I have lived in Washington, DC, for 20+ years. I do travel and even on the road I am the DC organic and cheap shopper. So big picture and minute details can be found here. Thanks for reading!

FTC Sets Endorsement Rules for Blogs

By Cecilia Kang
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Bloggers who offer endorsements must disclose any payments they have received from the subjects of their reviews or face penalties of up to $11,000 per violation, the Federal Trade Commission said Monday.

The agency, charged with protecting consumer interests, had not updated its policy on endorsements in nearly three decades, well before the Internet became a force in shaping consumer tastes. The new rules attempt to make more transparent corporate payments to bloggers, research firms and celebrities that help promote a product.

"Given that social media has become such a significant player in the advertising area, we thought it was necessary to address social media as well," said Richard Cleland, assistant director for the division of advertising practices at the FTC.

Consumer interest groups have long complained about the lack of disclosure. They say consumers often have no way of telling what corporate payments have been made to bloggers writing on parenting, fitness, dieting and financial services sites, for example.

Consumers Union, a nonprofit advocacy group that publishes Consumer Reports, launched WebWatch.com to monitor bloggers' ties to corporate sponsors. But the group shut down the site earlier this year after it ran out of funding.

"The revised guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement," the FTC said in a release. "Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service."

Rick Calvert, chief executive of the blogger conference BlogWorld & New Media Expo, said his organization believes bloggers should disclose compensation they receive from companies they write about, including when they receive free products.

But he said it would be difficult to enforce the FTC's policy with "tens of millions of blogs, podcasts and other forms of new media content out there and growing every day." And he said bloggers are divided about the rules, with some finding it perfectly acceptable to accept products without disclosure.

The new guidelines also affect how advertisers use studies by research institutes they help fund. Any financial ties must now be disclosed when companies cite the findings of a research organization they fund.

"We have for years tried to get the FTC to adopt fair disclosure of ties that provided financial support for studies that were submitted" to agencies like the Federal Communications Commission, said Joel Kelsey, a policy analyst at Consumers Union. "It's fine to submit those comments, we just absolutely believe they have to disclose if there are financial ties that led to the writing of those reports."

Punishments for violations will range from a warning letter to a fine of up to $11,000 per violation.

Copyright Disclaimer - Fair Use

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.